New financial instruments, integrated territorial investments ITI , and their governance and financing system: first experiences. Cross-border cooperation in a period of centrifugal forces: Interreg and policy mobility. Methods for policy evaluation: the role of academics, experts and consultants in understanding and improving CP.
Capitalisation of the CP: policy learning from three decades of CP, taking stock of progress and not reinventing the wheel. Please note that while we will assess all the proposals submitted to this special session, we will select only a limited number of proposals, bearing in mind their fit with the topics outlined above, complementarities between them and the overall coherence of the session.
Marijana Sumpor msumpor eizg. Janez Nared janez. We invite all colleagues interested in regional development and EU integration in South East Europe to submit a paper to this special session. South East Europe, once a well connected economic, political and cultural area, is struggling to re-establish its ties and become more connected after the period of conflicts.
The accession to the EU seems to be decisive in this process. Scientific discourse and cooperation can contribute to this process, by continuing in a constructive and fruitful manner the scientists have cooperated before the democratic transition. Also, new generations and early career researchers are more than welcome to join this session.
Possible topics of interest for this special session, but not exclusively, are the following:. One of the main objectives of the Structural Funds SF targeta the reducing regional differences. The aim of this session is to analyse whether the new Operational Programmes — of the EU Central and Eastern European CEE member states are better equipped to reduce regional disparities and involve local and regional authorities in policy making: whether they learned from the previous — period and initiated changes in the policy framework.
There should be serious concerns among regional policy makers of CEE countries, where national spatial polarization has sharpened over the last decade. CEE countries jumped on the globalization and Europeanization train in the early s.
- The Royalty Principle : A Guide to Reigning in the Kingdom of Heaven.
- The North Briton!
- Handbook on Social Stratification in the BRIC Countries:Change and Perspective.
- Building Bridges: Cities and Regions in a Transnational World;
- Graham Greene: Bipolar Catholic (A Handful of Catholics Book 5).
- Contact us.
- Navigation menu.
As a result, new declining regions have emerged and already existing patterns of spatial differentiation have intensified. GDP per capita and migration data show strong and gradually growing polarization between main metropolitan areas and the rest of the countries. Most affected are remote rural regions and some industrial agglomerations. Since peripheralization has amplified, we can also ask whether governance — which has been reformed in all CEE countries at least to some degree — and its institutional set up may have had an impact on this.
The Europeanization of local and regional governments in the CEE countries has been ambivalent. Recent studies conclude that CEE administrative systems have been effective with regard to the procedural regulatory and financial obligations but have had difficulties with programming which requires public administration organized at different spatial levels and, specifically, a concern with the content and effects of regional economic development policies which requires the wider involvement of enterprises, NGOs and other stakeholders.
Thus, administrative practices in Europe do not converge or harmonize but are translated into various processes and formats. The CEE local and regional authorities lack true knowledge necessary to understand the EU policy rationale and future oriented leadership capable of carrying out necessary institutional and structural changes. So far. Lessons, experiences, results of the previous programming period in addressing the problems of peripheries Are there signs of more active public discussion addressing peripheralization among national policy makers and politicians?
Are there new measures and institutions in the OPs targeted at reducing spatial differences? Are there initiatives that presumably improve the development capacity of local and regional authorities and involve them in policy making? Multipolicy approach on peripheries: relations between regional policy, rural development policy and spatial planning. Thereby a wide range of new and old concepts such as circular economy, bioeconomy, green economy and sustainable development are being used in policy making.
The concepts used are all related, partly overlapping and not always well defined and the exact definitions vary between national and international actors. However, the definitions made, mainly aim to develop an economy based on sustainable use of renewable resources to develop new processes and products. In a policy perspective all concepts in one way or another also link to the innovation of goods, services and processes, e. The role of policies at all levels from the local to the global therefore has a strong bearing on the concepts, where for example bioeconomy and circular economy have become significant for both the EU and the OECD.
To understand the underlying processes in the transition towards sustainability an important concept is knowledge dynamics stressing knowledge and learning as important drivers for innovation. Knowledge dynamics are increasingly cross-sectoral, multi-actor and multi-scalar.
- Falling Between Two Cracks: The Indeterminate Character of Mid-level Government | SpringerLink.
- A tool for all nations?
- Navigation menu!
- Falling Between Two Cracks: The Indeterminate Character of Mid-level Government.
- Finding Amy.
- Bestselling Series!
- Contact us!
Here a wide definition of innovation is used to recognize innovations in as well goods, services as processes and not only in technological development or natural scientific knowledge. Cross sectoral knowledge interactions draw on different disciplines, industries and expertise, whereas multi-actor knowledge interactions involve different actors such as researchers, producers, consumers, the civil society and public policy makers.
This latter perspective can also be related to the development of quadruple helix innovation systems, possibly seen as facilitators for the inclusion of more actors towards sustainable development. Some scholars also use the concept of quintuple helix and the inclusion of five helices, where the fifth helix is not an actual stakeholder but refers to the inclusion of environmental protection and natural settings in the innovation system.
Multi-scalar interactions highlight the fact that local and regional networks of interactions are not enough. Innovation involves knowledge relations between regions, countries and continents. All together cross-sectoral, multi-actor and multi-scalar knowledge interactions play an important role for radical innovation rather than for incremental changes in goods and services.
Radical innovations are also necessary to be able to achieve sustainability goals such as in relation to climate change or the transition to sustainable bioeconomy or circular economy. To address the complexity of societal challenges, and contribute towards solutions and transition to sustainability, different types of cross disciplinary research and development projects need to be developed, including transdisciplinary work involving non-academic partners.
To this session we welcome papers addressing issues related to a transition of the economy into for example bioeconomy or circular economy through and by knowledge dynamics and regional development policy. Such issues could include topics related to the restructuring of the economy focusing on knowledge dynamics, regional development, smart specialisation and regional innovation systems. To a large extent it also relates to new innovations, radical innovations, eco-innovations and a deepening of the knowledge about for example ecosystem services in both industry, society and as a tool for policy making.
It can also include topics related to the enlargement of earlier innovation systems from a triple to a quadruple or a quintuple helix system where civil society is included in the innovation system. How can civil society be included in innovation processes in the transition to bioeconomy or a circular economy?
How can regional development policies be designed to contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth? Are new kinds of bioeconomy innovation systems being developed through knowledge interaction across sectors, scales and actors — and across regions or countries?see
Public administration - Wikipedia
Can climate challenges work as drivers for new innovations and ecosystem services contributing to sustainable development? Therefore, we wish to invite scholars to discuss, analyse and interpret current trends within urban and regional development using a critical perspective where power and the political are common denominators. Moreover, we also recognize that critical studies of urban and regional development is a broad endeavour, and therefore accept papers that fit within the critical category in general.
Last, but not least, Critical Studies of Urban and Regional Development has successfully been organized at the RSA conferences in Izmir and Piacenza so this marks the third time that the special session will be held, facilitating an opportunity for those interested in critical approaches to discuss, form networks and plan future research.
- [email protected] - March | Economic Development Administration.
- 2016 RSA Annual Conference Special Sessions.
- Reinventing Local and Regional Economies - CRC Press Book.
- Sessions - RSA Annual Conference Special Sessions - Regional Studies Association!
The Research Network established initially in became a recognized meeting point for everyone with an interest in issues relating to tourism from a development perspective. The field will require many more years of collaborative research before it becomes a widely recognized academic study. Some public administration programs have similarities to business administration programs, in cases where the students from both the Master's in Public Administration MPA and Master's in Business Administration MBA programs take many of the same courses. The MPA is related to similar graduate-level government studies programs including Master of Arts MA programs in public affairs, public policy , and political science.
MPA degrees may be more likely to include program emphases on policy analysis techniques or other topical focuses such as the study of international affairs as opposed to MA degrees, which tend to focus on constitutional issues such as separation of powers , administrative law , contracting with government, problems of governance and power, and participatory democracy.
Some MPA degrees may be more oriented towards training students to undertake public service work tasks, whereas some MA programs may have a more academic, theoretical focus. Some universities offer their Masters in public administration as an MA degree e. Community programs may offer internships or continuing education credits. The DPA is an applied-research doctoral degree in the field of public administration, focusing on the practice of public administration more than on its theoretical aspects.
The DPA requires coursework beyond the Masters level and a thesis, dissertation or other doctoral project.
THIS IS AN ARCHIVED SITE
Upon successful completion of the doctoral requirements, the title of "Doctor" is awarded and the post-nominals of D. Some universities use the Ph. The Ph. Individuals pursuing a Ph. Notable scholars of public administration have come from a range of fields. In the period before public administration existed as its own independent discipline, scholars contributing to the field came from economics, sociology, management, political science, administrative law, and, other related fields.
More recently, scholars from public administration and public policy have contributed important studies and theories. There are a number of international public administration organizations. Its biennial conference brings together ministers of public service, top public officials and leading scholars. Based in Brussels, Belgium, the IIAS is a worldwide platform providing a space for exchanges that promote knowledge and good practices to improve the organization and operation of public administration.
The IIAS also aims to ensure that public agencies will be in a position to better respond to the current and future expectations and needs of society. IASIA is an association of organizations and individuals whose activities and interests focus on public administration and management. The activities of its members include education and training of administrators and managers. It is the only worldwide scholarly association in the field of public management.
Created in , this regional network of schools is unique in that it is the only organization to be composed of institutions from North and Latin America and the Caribbean working in public administration and policy analysis. It has more than 49 members from top research schools in various countries throughout the hemisphere.
2016 RSA Annual Conference Special Sessions
Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration EROPA is a state-membership based organization, open to other organizations and individuals, headquartered in The Philippines with centres and membership organized around the Asia Pacific region. It has a number of centres in the region, and assists in networking experts with its members. These business approaches often aim to maximize efficiency and effectiveness and provide improved customer service. A contrast is drawn with the study of public administration, which emphasizes the social and cultural drivers of government that many contend e.
Allison and Charles Goodsell makes it different from the private sector. Comparative public management, through government performance auditing , examines the efficiency and effectiveness of two or more governments.